Bakst v. Dunn 8-31-2019 EPK – “[A] transfer or concealment made with the actual intent to hinder or delay a creditor is sufficient for denial of discharge, even if there is no actual fraudulent intent.” Id. at 109-10 (citing NCNB Texas Nat’l Bank v. Bowyer (In re Bowyer), 916 F.2d 1056, 1059 (5th Cir. 1990), rev’d on other grounds, 932 F.2d 1100 (5th Cir. 1991); Crews v. First Colony Life Ins. Co. (In re Barker), 168 B.R. 773, 780 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1994)).
Add a header to begin generating the table of contents